14-11-2024, 02:31 AM
The original point for me is how the multiple scribes theory and Currier A + B interact
The part I'm most interested in is the part I'm most lost with though
Paraphrasing
"5 Scribes created a text which contains 2 differing texts, Currier A and B. This is due to them each using their own words. (and not due to different languages)"
Why do we have 2 "languages" and not 5? A way to answer that is to group scribes up somehow. If anything that would be supporting the idea of there being two distinct ways of writing "Voynichese" rather than supporting individual word choices creating differences.
I'd like to read his work so I can see what he has to say properly rather than a quick video, but £45s a bit steep for me..
The part I'm most interested in is the part I'm most lost with though
Paraphrasing
"5 Scribes created a text which contains 2 differing texts, Currier A and B. This is due to them each using their own words. (and not due to different languages)"
Why do we have 2 "languages" and not 5? A way to answer that is to group scribes up somehow. If anything that would be supporting the idea of there being two distinct ways of writing "Voynichese" rather than supporting individual word choices creating differences.
I'd like to read his work so I can see what he has to say properly rather than a quick video, but £45s a bit steep for me..