There's a You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. published by someone called Raj Ponnaluri. I'm guessing he's not on the forum, or he would have posted this himself! He's done a youtube video but I wasn't really able to follow how he comes to his conclusions just from the video.
Wonder if there's a preprint somewhere. The article has obviously passed peer review but some of the categorical statements in the youtube video (e.g. that the article proves it is only one language, and there is no evidence for multiple languages) make me feel a little cautious. I don't happen to think there are multiple languages (assuming there is any language) but the differences in Currier A and B (not to mention Lisa's scribes) would stop me saying that categorically. I feel it's hard for us to say anything so categorical unless/until it is ever deciphered. Will be interesting to see the argument!
Wonder if there's a preprint somewhere. The article has obviously passed peer review but some of the categorical statements in the youtube video (e.g. that the article proves it is only one language, and there is no evidence for multiple languages) make me feel a little cautious. I don't happen to think there are multiple languages (assuming there is any language) but the differences in Currier A and B (not to mention Lisa's scribes) would stop me saying that categorically. I feel it's hard for us to say anything so categorical unless/until it is ever deciphered. Will be interesting to see the argument!

![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)