27-09-2024, 07:24 PM
There is a certain difficulty in the interpretation of the two tub patterns with regard to their appearance. It is naturally assumed that things that are the same should look the same. And here, they don't.
Remember the lesson of the cosmic investigation. The VMs artist employs the maximum amount of visual difference within the bounds of structural integrity. Thus, in comparison with the unique cosmic structures of BNF Fr. 565 and Harley 334 and their pictorial representation of the inverted T-O Earth, the VMs has used vords. Appearance has been totally altered, but structure remains in place. That's why the structural confirmations in White Aries are important.
The two blue-striped patterns differ in the way they have been drawn - the ink part. This leads to various questions, starting with VMs Pisces, as to how patterns of alternating lines *should* be drawn, and then how they were drawn in the VMs?
Then the question, how should these elements be interpreted? What are the different markings? This is not fully resolved. How do these interpretations combine with the blue, painted stripes? The reliance on appearance leads to more unresolved confusion.
The problem is that the interpretations do not combine. Such combination is a flawed assumption that is not valid in heraldry. It's a sort of "any fool knows that" situation mean to misdirect those who don't know what they're doing. It could be intentional obfuscation. Nevertheless, the paired patterns of diagonal blue stripes are still there along with the hat and everything else, waiting for the reader who knows the armorial history of the origins of the tradition of the cardinal's red galero, and more importantly, perhaps, they were subtly put in place by someone making covert use of that information.
And then there is the connection with Stolfi's marker. How many paths to 'the solution' might there be? The VMs was created as a puzzle. It's one or none.
Remember the lesson of the cosmic investigation. The VMs artist employs the maximum amount of visual difference within the bounds of structural integrity. Thus, in comparison with the unique cosmic structures of BNF Fr. 565 and Harley 334 and their pictorial representation of the inverted T-O Earth, the VMs has used vords. Appearance has been totally altered, but structure remains in place. That's why the structural confirmations in White Aries are important.
The two blue-striped patterns differ in the way they have been drawn - the ink part. This leads to various questions, starting with VMs Pisces, as to how patterns of alternating lines *should* be drawn, and then how they were drawn in the VMs?
Then the question, how should these elements be interpreted? What are the different markings? This is not fully resolved. How do these interpretations combine with the blue, painted stripes? The reliance on appearance leads to more unresolved confusion.
The problem is that the interpretations do not combine. Such combination is a flawed assumption that is not valid in heraldry. It's a sort of "any fool knows that" situation mean to misdirect those who don't know what they're doing. It could be intentional obfuscation. Nevertheless, the paired patterns of diagonal blue stripes are still there along with the hat and everything else, waiting for the reader who knows the armorial history of the origins of the tradition of the cardinal's red galero, and more importantly, perhaps, they were subtly put in place by someone making covert use of that information.
And then there is the connection with Stolfi's marker. How many paths to 'the solution' might there be? The VMs was created as a puzzle. It's one or none.