Thanks, everyone. I have updated the curated thread to add two theories to the main list and include a segment with links to forum threads on unclear/unidentified language theories. Middle English is now solely in second place - a legacy of the old Roger Bacon rumour?
If you create a post and outline your language theory, I will happily add it to the list. But your current thread is only about the 116v text, so it would be a bit odd if I linked to that.
It is just a bit of fun, and the Olympics is on now. There are likely a lot of Latin theories because many contemporary manuscripts were written in Latin.
None are pretending. They all believe they have solved it, just as passionately and sincerely as you believe you have solved it. As to how we decide, we are waiting for the solution that i) provides a sensible translation and ii) is reproducible by others and iii) explains line patterns and entropy and other weird Voynichese behaviour. No one has managed even one of those.
We've had at least two others say something similar, and I don't understand it. If you post your solution here and it is recognized as having merit, you have established your academic priority and people will be keen to support you to develop it. If you post your solution here and it turns out to be like the many others, no one would want to steal it. But in either case, you would have established yourself as the 'owner'.
(09-08-2024, 04:53 PM)BessAgritianin wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And you want to exclude the only truthful texts from further discussions? Very interesting.
If you create a post and outline your language theory, I will happily add it to the list. But your current thread is only about the 116v text, so it would be a bit odd if I linked to that.
(09-08-2024, 05:02 PM)BessAgritianin wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Another thought for TAVI.
Why the number of the theories determines Your golden medals?
Is it not what truth is that is worth golden evaluation.
It is just a bit of fun, and the Olympics is on now. There are likely a lot of Latin theories because many contemporary manuscripts were written in Latin.
(09-08-2024, 05:28 PM)BessAgritianin wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Let us say, We have hundreds of researchers, who are pretending to have found the solution of VM.
If only one of them is telling the truth and all the rest are disillusioned, how do you decide?
None are pretending. They all believe they have solved it, just as passionately and sincerely as you believe you have solved it. As to how we decide, we are waiting for the solution that i) provides a sensible translation and ii) is reproducible by others and iii) explains line patterns and entropy and other weird Voynichese behaviour. No one has managed even one of those.
Quote: I am a Patent Engineer and do not want to disclose everything on a web page. I don't want that in future someone else puts his or her name under my findings...
We've had at least two others say something similar, and I don't understand it. If you post your solution here and it is recognized as having merit, you have established your academic priority and people will be keen to support you to develop it. If you post your solution here and it turns out to be like the many others, no one would want to steal it. But in either case, you would have established yourself as the 'owner'.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)