You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. has the Greek text side by side with a Latin translation. The text for Narthex in Paris Greek 2179 and Morgan M.652 appears to be identical. Both lack the last words (in parentheses) of the printed text. The passage is entirely about the medical use of the plant. The only part describing some of the plant is the one that is missing in the two manuscripts, and anyway it says nothing of the flower. So it seems more likely that the corruption of the image was independent from the text (though I find it hard to imagine what happened with Narthex). To make things even more complex, Collins believes that the text and illustrations of Paris Greek 2179 came from two distinct sources.
These are the two plants from the Latin Dioscorides You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (left: Ferula Narthex, right: Peucedanum). Also in this case, the illustrations do not seem to have much to do with the actual plants.
These are the two plants from the Latin Dioscorides You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (left: Ferula Narthex, right: Peucedanum). Also in this case, the illustrations do not seem to have much to do with the actual plants.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)