18-04-2024, 12:16 PM
This new theory makes me wonder if all opinions are respectable. In matters of religion or politics, of course, but in matters of science, and the VM is an object of science, is anything that is said valid? Does the Rosettes page represent coitus and conception, really?
This theory reminds me of another one formulated by two respectable people that the VM plants come from ancient Mexico. People are always respectable, their scientific theories are not
In the VM nothing is certain, but there are things that are more probable than others. Speaking of the illustrations, some members of this forum know that well. In the case of the Rosettes, it is most likely that this page is some kind of cosmological representation or something similar.
Why is attention paid to any theory, like that of coitus? This forum has become a forum that only serves to hang out and have fun. I don't criticize that, but the VM is above all an object of science. And if the people who have dedicated years to the study of this codex do not reach a minimum consensus, we will never be doing science.
This theory reminds me of another one formulated by two respectable people that the VM plants come from ancient Mexico. People are always respectable, their scientific theories are not
In the VM nothing is certain, but there are things that are more probable than others. Speaking of the illustrations, some members of this forum know that well. In the case of the Rosettes, it is most likely that this page is some kind of cosmological representation or something similar.
Why is attention paid to any theory, like that of coitus? This forum has become a forum that only serves to hang out and have fun. I don't criticize that, but the VM is above all an object of science. And if the people who have dedicated years to the study of this codex do not reach a minimum consensus, we will never be doing science.