The Rosettes Page - March 2024

[Mark Knowles]

What you or anyone who disagrees with my idea ought to do is produce their own theory of the page as detailed to my own.

I'm not sure I see the logic of this.  If we want to refute a "solver", do we need to go solve the manuscript ourselves?

I am not sure anyone has provided a refutation. But I accept that this kind of theory is difficult to refute. So trying to produce a detailed alternative theory is a useful challenge.

I have put a lot of time and effort in my theory of Rosettes page. I have studied maps of the time, contacted experts. So when someone says the page represents the cosmos or anything else, but provides very few further details of their theory I find it unhelpful. I think the challenge and the difficulty is in producing a complete detailed theory. I can't even attempt to refute a theory which is so vague and lacking in details as most theories of the page are.