On plain texts and ciphers (a thought experiment)
#22
(10-09-2016, 05:11 PM)Emma May Smith wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.By the by, I do personally think that initial [q] and final [l] are likely to be morphological markers. I just can't prove it. I don't think we're at the point where we can understand the text and underlying language well enough.
I think the fact that q is almost totally absent from the labels points toward it being a morphological marker of some kind - you don't need it to label individual items, but you do need it to write complete sentences.
[+] 3 users say Thank You to Sam G for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: On plain texts and ciphers (a thought experiment) - by Sam G - 10-09-2016, 05:59 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Plain text of Voynich manuscript Addsamuels 5 9,211 29-01-2023, 11:17 AM
Last Post: bi3mw

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)