09-09-2016, 04:35 PM
Sorry to sound impatient - but I did not offer a 'proposition' that the folio MIGHT be a map.
I analysed the image in detail, identified the structures, range, and particular details of topography, architecture and so on.
That it was a map was a conclusion from the evidence, and it seems to be a little frivolous to create alternative notions without troubling to address the existing research, evidence (primary and secondary).
IMO
I analysed the image in detail, identified the structures, range, and particular details of topography, architecture and so on.
That it was a map was a conclusion from the evidence, and it seems to be a little frivolous to create alternative notions without troubling to address the existing research, evidence (primary and secondary).
IMO


