[Article] A new Timm & Schinner publication regarding the Malta conference

[bi3mw]

Are you saying that this set of arguments is to be taken as seriously as the work of a trained palaeographer?

I agree with Rene here.  In general, I would say that the work of a trained palaeographer carries much more weight for me than the analysis of , sorry, laymans in this field. For me, a "critique at eye level" would only be that of another expert, unless one argues with the necessary caution and with reservations.

edit: Just because palaeography is not an exact science does not mean that education and years of training do not generate a significant knowledge advantage. I therefore find it understandable that Lisa no longer participates in a discussion in this form.

I am certain that he will continue to refute me in print and on this site, but I do not plan to rebut his arguments further.