01-09-2023, 06:38 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-09-2023, 07:03 AM by Torsten.
Edit Reason: small change
)
(01-09-2023, 02:11 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I really do not know what you are trying to argue.
If another palaeographer would go into a discussion with Lisa, then that would make sense, but not in this case.
"Along with anyone else, Torsten is more than welcome to disagree with me in accordance with his own observations, as no one should accept my conclusions without critical analysis." [You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.].
To my eyes the <k>-glyphs in <sokeey> in f107r.P.42 and in <todky> in f107r.P.45 were written with two quill strokes.
According to Lisa the <k> written by Scribe 1 and Scribe 3 is "distinguished by a sharp angle at the top of the first vertical as the quill changes direction, a bowed crossbar, a round loop, and a very slight foot at the base of the second vertical." [Lisa Fagin Davis, 2022, p. 3 You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.]. According to Lisa "a bowed bar tends to result from a smooth directional change from the top of the first vertical, while a horizontal crossbar is the result of lifting the quill after completing the vertical." [Lisa Fagin Davis, 2022, p. 3]
With other words I don't see what Lisa sees.
For more details see also You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. by Jan. B. Hurych (2007) as well as the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. by Timm & Schinner 2023.