Objective statistics about VMS text
#6
Some more statistics:
  • <y> appears 17,655 times, but in 6834 cases (38.7% of the time) it is in the combination <dy>

  • <n> appears 6,141 times, but in 5,824 cases (94.8%) it is word-final.

  • <n> appears 6,141 times, but in 4,760 cases (77.5%) it follows <i>

  • <e> appears 20,070 times, but in 8,167 cases (40.7%) it follows <h>


Whatever system created the VMS (natural language/cipher/abbreviations etc.) has to produce three outcomes:

  1. Certain glyphs appear almost always in certain positions (word-initial / word-final)
  2. Certain glyphs appear more commonly around other glyphs (e.g. k after o, r after a)
  3. Certain glyphs do both of the above two things.


An inference:
  • Whatever <q> is doing in the VMS, it does not seem to function independently of <o> (with which it's grouped 97.5% of the time), and the letter after <qo> is usually a gallows (84% of the time). <q> seems to "need" an "o-gallows", but "o-gallows" does not need <q> and is often found independent of <q>.
[+] 4 users say Thank You to ThomasCoon for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Objective statistics about VMS text - by ThomasCoon - 05-06-2023, 09:20 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Formulaic text, "micro-context", and language statistics Jorge_Stolfi 0 2,466 12-09-2025, 02:18 PM
Last Post: Jorge_Stolfi
  Statistics and the Voynich text Torsten 5 7,845 28-06-2022, 06:58 PM
Last Post: Ruby Novacna

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)