05-06-2023, 09:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-06-2023, 10:51 PM by ThomasCoon.)
Some more statistics:
Whatever system created the VMS (natural language/cipher/abbreviations etc.) has to produce three outcomes:
An inference:
- <y> appears 17,655 times, but in 6834 cases (38.7% of the time) it is in the combination <dy>
- <n> appears 6,141 times, but in 5,824 cases (94.8%) it is word-final.
- <n> appears 6,141 times, but in 4,760 cases (77.5%) it follows <i>
- <e> appears 20,070 times, but in 8,167 cases (40.7%) it follows <h>
Whatever system created the VMS (natural language/cipher/abbreviations etc.) has to produce three outcomes:
- Certain glyphs appear almost always in certain positions (word-initial / word-final)
- Certain glyphs appear more commonly around other glyphs (e.g. k after o, r after a)
- Certain glyphs do both of the above two things.
An inference:
- Whatever <q> is doing in the VMS, it does not seem to function independently of <o> (with which it's grouped 97.5% of the time), and the letter after <qo> is usually a gallows (84% of the time). <q> seems to "need" an "o-gallows", but "o-gallows" does not need <q> and is often found independent of <q>.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)