[Article] Cheshire at it again: "Palaeographic Instruction for the Ischia Manuscript"

[LisaFaginDavis]

It seems to be self-published, which means no peer review. No bibliography, no footnotes, so even if anyone wanted to follow up on any of this, there's no obvious way to do so, and readers have no choice but to simply accept or reject him at his word.

I just read through a bit of it, and while it might be entertaining as fiction (his interpretation of the Rose foldout is kind of creative and one might even say fun), he continues to provide only his own self-fulfilling "translation" of the text and reading of the imagery. His insistance that he's correct isn't sufficient proof and, as ever, if you follow the trail of publications back to the beginning and examine his first steps, it all falls apart. Perhaps that's why he doesn't cite any previous work, even his own.