27-09-2022, 06:31 PM
What if part of the written text actually is nonsense and part of it is encrypted? That seems like a totally elegant way to deter the curious. If you start off with a bunch of stuff that will never make sense, investigators may well give up. And modern statistical analysis will also be messy.
If the text cannot be read, the text cannot be read. Consequently, there is nowhere else to turn other than the illustrations. Which ones will make sense and which ones might contribute to moving the VMs investigation forward? There are only a few, just the ones that stand out most obviously.
What about the VMs cosmos? Has the comparison with BNF Fr. 565 and Harley 334 been forgotten or negated? How can recognition function without an awareness of the original information? And even if this interpretation is considered hypothetical, it is clear that a nebuly line functions as a cosmic boundary in the VMs cosmos (with 43 undulations). The unusual cosmic structure that is seen in all three illustrations is a complete rejection of the standard, geocentric model of planetary spheres relevant to the time. Both historical illustrations have provenance from Paris during the VMs C-14 dates or shortly after - before 1450.
What about the VMs mermaid? Again, with similarities to an illustration in Harley 334. Yet the VMs representation of a mermaid is unique because she has thighs and mermaids do not have thighs. Introducing Melusine of Luxembourg.
How can a VMs investigation ignore the illustrations? The proper interpretation of the illustrations might offer essential clues relating to the translation of the written text.
If the text cannot be read, the text cannot be read. Consequently, there is nowhere else to turn other than the illustrations. Which ones will make sense and which ones might contribute to moving the VMs investigation forward? There are only a few, just the ones that stand out most obviously.
What about the VMs cosmos? Has the comparison with BNF Fr. 565 and Harley 334 been forgotten or negated? How can recognition function without an awareness of the original information? And even if this interpretation is considered hypothetical, it is clear that a nebuly line functions as a cosmic boundary in the VMs cosmos (with 43 undulations). The unusual cosmic structure that is seen in all three illustrations is a complete rejection of the standard, geocentric model of planetary spheres relevant to the time. Both historical illustrations have provenance from Paris during the VMs C-14 dates or shortly after - before 1450.
What about the VMs mermaid? Again, with similarities to an illustration in Harley 334. Yet the VMs representation of a mermaid is unique because she has thighs and mermaids do not have thighs. Introducing Melusine of Luxembourg.
How can a VMs investigation ignore the illustrations? The proper interpretation of the illustrations might offer essential clues relating to the translation of the written text.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)