26-09-2022, 08:55 AM
Giving text repetition as a reason for a meaningless text is fundamentally wrong.
If you read old books in your native language, and also look at others, words and sections of text are quite often in repetition.
I read the books. There is so much paraphrasing, sometimes they just don't get to the point.
I remember "So nim ..... and nim ... , it has and will ....".
It's not a cipher of the time, is far fetched. I know other.
The Templars marked their alphabet with a dot. "From one make two".
If I am right with the "4", and there are really two of them, this throws a completely different light on the matter. "From one make two"
Combinations of characters is also not new. Nick has a whole list somewhere.
It's understanding what's possible and applying them in the VM manuscript example.
Questions:
Why can EVA "S" also be used as an ending. What does "@" mean and when was it applied. What connection does it have with "a8" and what about "c8".
If "a8 = at", then "c8 = et" would be.
In the Middle Ages, "@" was used as "ad". Comes originally from the Greek.
What I want to say, he has not even scratched the surface
Translated with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (free version)
If you read old books in your native language, and also look at others, words and sections of text are quite often in repetition.
I read the books. There is so much paraphrasing, sometimes they just don't get to the point.
I remember "So nim ..... and nim ... , it has and will ....".
It's not a cipher of the time, is far fetched. I know other.
The Templars marked their alphabet with a dot. "From one make two".
If I am right with the "4", and there are really two of them, this throws a completely different light on the matter. "From one make two"
Combinations of characters is also not new. Nick has a whole list somewhere.
It's understanding what's possible and applying them in the VM manuscript example.
Questions:
Why can EVA "S" also be used as an ending. What does "@" mean and when was it applied. What connection does it have with "a8" and what about "c8".
If "a8 = at", then "c8 = et" would be.
In the Middle Ages, "@" was used as "ad". Comes originally from the Greek.
What I want to say, he has not even scratched the surface
Translated with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (free version)