14-03-2022, 07:50 PM
Lisa (and/or others involved), what is your opinion on submissions about the imagery? Although the list of options is non-exhaustive, the subject of imagery is still conspicuously absent.
Is the conference purposefully focused on linguistics and digital applications because this is the specialization of the organizing professors?
I understand that a lot of nonsense is written about the imagery, and also a lot of things that cannot be mathematically proven. In part this is because the VM imagery attracts its fair share of fantasies. But another factor is that iconography in itself, even about non-VM subjects, is more interpretative than certain other disciplines.
So I wonder if it is at all possible to have a submission about the imagery approved for the conference? I think I have a fairly good idea of what is not desired, but what kind of research on the imagery could be accepted?
(Lisa, I asked this by PM but then thought it might be relevant for others too, so you can ignore my PM).
Is the conference purposefully focused on linguistics and digital applications because this is the specialization of the organizing professors?
I understand that a lot of nonsense is written about the imagery, and also a lot of things that cannot be mathematically proven. In part this is because the VM imagery attracts its fair share of fantasies. But another factor is that iconography in itself, even about non-VM subjects, is more interpretative than certain other disciplines.
So I wonder if it is at all possible to have a submission about the imagery approved for the conference? I think I have a fairly good idea of what is not desired, but what kind of research on the imagery could be accepted?
(Lisa, I asked this by PM but then thought it might be relevant for others too, so you can ignore my PM).
