I'm not sure whose statements about the VMS Zodiac imagery have been more grossly misrepresented here - mine or Ewa Sniezynska-Stolot's. 
Her statement that Aries has been "redrawn from a calendar" is plainly a suggestion that the Aries image originated outside the usual collection of Zodiac imagery. Obviously that's in perfect agreement with what I've proposed, so the idea that her view contradicts mine is obviously absurd.
The idea that what I've proposed contradicts existing studies of the VMS Zodiac imagery is also completely absurd, in fact I cited one of the studies named above in my original post precisely to make my point.
It's impossible to have a productive discussion if you do not honestly represent the views of others - both participants in the discussion and people outside of the discussion (e.g. experts).
Anyway, I'd still be interested in gathering more opinions as to whether or not the resemblances between the images I've pointed out are likely to be coincidental or not.
Hmm, I actually hadn't thought of that, but it kind of does continue the "pairing paradigm" in the sense of being a two-in-one composite image. Maybe that's a coincidence, but there might actually be something to it.
Her statement that Aries has been "redrawn from a calendar" is plainly a suggestion that the Aries image originated outside the usual collection of Zodiac imagery. Obviously that's in perfect agreement with what I've proposed, so the idea that her view contradicts mine is obviously absurd.
The idea that what I've proposed contradicts existing studies of the VMS Zodiac imagery is also completely absurd, in fact I cited one of the studies named above in my original post precisely to make my point.
It's impossible to have a productive discussion if you do not honestly represent the views of others - both participants in the discussion and people outside of the discussion (e.g. experts).
Anyway, I'd still be interested in gathering more opinions as to whether or not the resemblances between the images I've pointed out are likely to be coincidental or not.
(15-08-2016, 09:43 PM)R. Sale wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It is a paradigm shift. And its presence is obvious. It's the paring paradigm - a pair in the real world and a *pair* in the VMs.
Hmm, I actually hadn't thought of that, but it kind of does continue the "pairing paradigm" in the sense of being a two-in-one composite image. Maybe that's a coincidence, but there might actually be something to it.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)