16-12-2021, 08:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 16-12-2021, 08:39 PM by Mark Knowles.)
I think it is difficult as why some theories should be represented in wikipedia is debatable. In English wikipedia it lists:
William Romaine Newbold
Joseph Martin Feely
Leonell C. Strong
Robert S. Brumbaugh
John Stojko
Stephen Bax
Nicholas Gibbs
Greg Kondrak
Ahmet Ardıç
Should any of these people be there?
Newbold's theory is one of the least plausible. Why should he be there, is it just because his theory is one of the earliest?
Are the theories there on the basis of the amount of publicity that they have received not on the basis of the merits of the theory?
William Romaine Newbold
Joseph Martin Feely
Leonell C. Strong
Robert S. Brumbaugh
John Stojko
Stephen Bax
Nicholas Gibbs
Greg Kondrak
Ahmet Ardıç
Should any of these people be there?
Newbold's theory is one of the least plausible. Why should he be there, is it just because his theory is one of the earliest?
Are the theories there on the basis of the amount of publicity that they have received not on the basis of the merits of the theory?

