[Article] Cheshire at it again: "Palaeographic Instruction for the Ischia Manuscript"
#42
I think it is difficult as why some theories should be represented in wikipedia is debatable. In English wikipedia it lists:

William Romaine Newbold
Joseph Martin Feely
Leonell C. Strong
Robert S. Brumbaugh
John Stojko
Stephen Bax
Nicholas Gibbs
Greg Kondrak
Ahmet Ardıç

Should any of these people be there?

Newbold's theory is one of the least plausible. Why should he be there, is it just because his theory is one of the earliest?

Are the theories there on the basis of the amount of publicity that they have received not on the basis of the merits of the theory?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Cheshire at it again: "Palaeographic Instruction for the Ischia Manuscript" - by Mark Knowles - 16-12-2021, 08:37 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)