[Article] Cheshire at it again: "Palaeographic Instruction for the Ischia Manuscript"
#32
Well, isn't that the motto these days. 'Go for your dream; no matter what others may say.' So, he's doing his thing. That's *his* problem - mostly. When it passes the VMs Botanical interpretation test, let me know.

If a solution is proposed, that solution has a methodology of derivation. With that methodology provided, it can be applied to a randomly selected VMs botanical folio. The results of the interpretations from other independent investigators should be substantially similar. When that happens, like I said, let me know.

That's the difference between the linguistic and illustrative aspects of VMs investigation. The illustrative aspects have their artistic and historical counterparts. 'Coincidently' much of this data fits within the C-14 dates The linguistic aspects have their vords, and glyphs, and statistics. Is it possible that the two sides are connected in the VMs; that the illustrations were intended to provide some information about the language? A cursory examination of VMs White Aries does not reveal its true depth. Look for information where information is provided. There is a visual code. It's called heraldry. Used to be popular (C-14) and can be historically verified.

Hey, just got a notification regarding the Nahuatl interpretation. Are they giving up on that one? I doubt it.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Cheshire at it again: "Palaeographic Instruction for the Ischia Manuscript" - by R. Sale - 12-12-2021, 08:44 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)