I can not argue against the statement of people seeing patterns that are not intended to be there, especially in the VMs illustrations. However, the contrasting situation would be the failure to see something that was intended to be included, but that discovery has been precluded because the chosen, historical details have no potential for recognition and the recovery of their traditional interpretation.
There are two scale-like tub patterns - one on Pisces and one on Dark Aries. They had no name; they had no purpose; they had no identity. According to heraldic tradition this pattern is a traditional tincture. It is a fur called papelonny. Now the pattern has a name. A name that is 'recovered' from the traditional interpretation of armorial heraldry. Heraldry provides several other significant, historical details and interpretations - and those who don't know the specific heraldic details cannot find the traditional interpretation or the purpose of the papelonny patterns.
There are two scale-like tub patterns - one on Pisces and one on Dark Aries. They had no name; they had no purpose; they had no identity. According to heraldic tradition this pattern is a traditional tincture. It is a fur called papelonny. Now the pattern has a name. A name that is 'recovered' from the traditional interpretation of armorial heraldry. Heraldry provides several other significant, historical details and interpretations - and those who don't know the specific heraldic details cannot find the traditional interpretation or the purpose of the papelonny patterns.