If this be called a theory, then it's rather two different theories, and I jumped from one to the other in the course of thought. The first one is about four "basic" numbers represented by bigrams, the other one is about ol preserving its plain text mapping in concatenation with other chunks. The two can be reconciled by supposing that these "basic" bigrams preserve their "numeric" essensc only as standalone or when concatenated with each other. However, the problem would be when other bigrams beside ol appear as prefixes or suffixes, while "ein" is a perfect prefix or suffux, the same cannot be said about "zwei" or "drei".
Not necessarily constructed language. A nomenclator code would do.
(10-08-2021, 09:32 PM)Emma May Smith wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.That the four first numbers are so similar in sound and shape. Literally only two vowels and two consonants. So you would need to propose a constructed language for this to be true.
Not necessarily constructed language. A nomenclator code would do.