[split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov
#49
Although interesting, "gaf" is less likely than "gas" - first because there's virtually no place for the stroke, second because there is a character much like "f" in Line 0 (in that extremely strange last word which seems to end with "fer"), and its shape differs from the hypothetic "f" in "gaf"

"So nim gas mich" has the following advantages:

- it sounds natural (no deviations)
- it generally fits into possible contexts
- letter shapes are in accordance with other letters in the folio

And it has only two drawbacks:

- there's actually no space between "gas" and "mich"
- the round object is unexplained

But neither of these two is avoided with "gaf" instead of "gas".

So my vote would be for "gas" as a working thread.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - by Anton - 18-07-2016, 11:41 AM
"gaf mich" on f116v marginalia - by Torsten - 24-11-2016, 12:22 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Big f116v spillover thread. ololololo 98 13,297 04-08-2026, 04:34 PM
Last Post: JoJo_Jost
  [split] Palaeography of f116v Aga Tentakulus 19 22,513 14-02-2021, 05:25 AM
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus
  [split] Marginalia Latin script [GENERAL DISCUSSION] -JKP- 15 20,509 03-07-2018, 10:25 AM
Last Post: -JKP-

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)