[split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov
#39
I haven't had time to blog about this (or about anything lately) but I have spent much time looking at "gas mich" trying to determine if that is a long-S or an f because it looks like a rub in the parchment many have removed or impeded the stroke for the "f" (if it is an f).

If it's a long-S, I can't make much sense of the statement but...


If it is an "f" then gaf mich does make some sense as "gaf" was used, in a limited region in the German-speaking lowlands, to mean "gave". It was not frequently used, but I came across it in some late 14th-century and early 15th-century documents. I'm worry, I haven't the time to look up the references but if it happens to be "f", it would add the possibility of a somewhat fractured Germanic statement something like...

"so to take gave me" which may seem strange but could be interpreted in English as "so/thus [s/he] gave me [this] to take" (as in a medicine or as a charm, for example).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - by -JKP- - 17-07-2016, 07:58 AM
"gaf mich" on f116v marginalia - by Torsten - 24-11-2016, 12:22 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Big f116v spillover thread. ololololo 98 13,297 04-08-2026, 04:34 PM
Last Post: JoJo_Jost
  [split] Palaeography of f116v Aga Tentakulus 19 22,513 14-02-2021, 05:25 AM
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus
  [split] Marginalia Latin script [GENERAL DISCUSSION] -JKP- 15 20,509 03-07-2018, 10:25 AM
Last Post: -JKP-

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)