[split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov
#37
David - your comment sums up well why I argue an initial 'language group' approach instead of pondering over the details of specific dialects. Also, we need a formal method. See my thread in the tasks subforum where I propose an approach. 

A first step would be to have our members who know a thing or two about paleography to agree on a set of possible readings for each word. This would give us a formal data set to start from and avoid having the same discussions over and over.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - by Koen G - 13-07-2016, 08:30 AM
"gaf mich" on f116v marginalia - by Torsten - 24-11-2016, 12:22 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Big f116v spillover thread. ololololo 98 13,297 04-08-2026, 04:34 PM
Last Post: JoJo_Jost
  [split] Palaeography of f116v Aga Tentakulus 19 22,513 14-02-2021, 05:25 AM
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus
  [split] Marginalia Latin script [GENERAL DISCUSSION] -JKP- 15 20,509 03-07-2018, 10:25 AM
Last Post: -JKP-

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)