[split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov
#17
(11-07-2016, 01:04 AM)Anton wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Quote:But I personally think that option A is correct - that "ubern" is an elided "uberen/oberen."

And this "uberen" is accusative?

Also, Lexer You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. that valde is past tense (if I understand correctly) of vellen. Can anything be made out of this?


Yes - "en" is the accusative masculine adjective ending - or "valden uberen" is really "vald den uberen" (fold the upper part - Middle High German can run two words together in this way) and "den uberen" is accusative.

I'll look into the vellen thing and get back to you
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - by ThomasCoon - 11-07-2016, 01:51 AM
"gaf mich" on f116v marginalia - by Torsten - 24-11-2016, 12:22 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Big f116v spillover thread. ololololo 98 13,297 04-08-2026, 04:34 PM
Last Post: JoJo_Jost
  [split] Palaeography of f116v Aga Tentakulus 19 22,513 14-02-2021, 05:25 AM
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus
  [split] Marginalia Latin script [GENERAL DISCUSSION] -JKP- 15 20,509 03-07-2018, 10:25 AM
Last Post: -JKP-

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)