Sorry, guys, I'm not sure I see anything, in particular. Maybe it's the light at the end of the tunnel. Maybe it's a flourish of fabric, a silken or mystical veil. Notice how unequal they are with the parts that are inside the text band. Each one is that way. Does it mean anything? Does every thing in the VMs have a meaning and origin that is significant and relevant to the purpose of this manuscript's creation? And more importantly, is that purpose expository - intended to explain ideas and beliefs? Or is there something more? Is the expository appearance a pretext and pretense, a false façade meant to disguise some ulterior purpose? Furthermore, what would be the nature of such a 'purpose' and how might it be accomplished. And furthermore, how could it do so in a manner which a lot of diligent investigation has failed to translate into the language of your choice?
Besides the VMs language, there are VMs illustrations. How are they interpreted? Is there a connection between the illustrations and the language and what is the nature of that connection? Could illustrations guide the discovery of language in the VMs?
How is it that these VMs illustrations take on the 'presumption' of meaning? And though it is potentially worthwhile to look into new areas of investigation, it may also be useful to consider past discoveries more thoroughly where their provenance tends to converge. [What happened to the 'curated threads'?]
Besides the VMs language, there are VMs illustrations. How are they interpreted? Is there a connection between the illustrations and the language and what is the nature of that connection? Could illustrations guide the discovery of language in the VMs?
How is it that these VMs illustrations take on the 'presumption' of meaning? And though it is potentially worthwhile to look into new areas of investigation, it may also be useful to consider past discoveries more thoroughly where their provenance tends to converge. [What happened to the 'curated threads'?]