04-10-2020, 10:24 PM
(04-10-2020, 10:14 PM)Mark Knowles wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So in that instance if a label and an operator is an evil spirit
No, you seem to not grab the idea.
A label and an operator is not an evil spirit.
Instead, an operator over an evil spirit is a label.
Suppose, the evil spirit is "vodka". And the operator is "o". The label would be "ovodka". If the operator means "related to", the label reads "related to vodka". It is to be understood that the object thus labeled, be that star, naked woman or a pipe (which btw I suppose to be blood vessels and various guts), is related to vodka. And it's absolutely of no surprise that a group of different and even inhomogenous objects may be related to the same object.
(04-10-2020, 10:14 PM)Mark Knowles wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Then if otor means o+tor then one needs, I think, to explain the degree of similarity in spelling of tol, kol, tor and how they can have distinct meanings with such similar spellings.
Yes, that's the important question, and my best guess so far has been a nomenclator solution.

