frequent Voynich vords in Slavic VCI and West Slavic languages

[geoffreycaveney]

Text on the innermost ring of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (“White Aries”):

oteeol otal chs char cheky chetshy okeeody oteey chekes

Using geoffreycaveney’s VCI substitutions, I get:

béz ba(s) ir jal jetə jepržə dégə béə jeter

I used “ə” as a placeholder for [EVA]y[/EVA]. I just felt like a schwa was just easier for my brain to parse as an unknown vowel, or vowel-flavored variable, if you will, than y. 
I’d be interested to hear any L1 or experienced L2 speakers of Slavic languages’ take on this.

Thanks Renegade! I will have to study my Sorbian resources to see if I can make any sense out of this reading, but it doesn't look too bad as a natural language-like string of text at first glance. 
The schwa is not a bad choice for EVA [y]; in my own modified Slavic VCI I am now just using <#>. (Please note Koen's new result that combining his best verbose cipher analysis with treatment of [y] as a null increases h2 conditional entropy to 3.20, the best such result yet!) 
Also note that I now use <rj> rather than <rž> for EVA [sh]. 
And EVA [od], like EVA [d], will be complicated: I mainly read [d] as <c> now, a logical linguistic result of palatalization of /k/. EVA [od] is even trickier, since /g/ could undergo palatalization to <ž> but also lenition to <h>. They look like completely different sounds but they both arose from historical /g/. 
Oh and definitely <bas> now for [otal]; omitting the <s> was a half-way measure in my original VCI system, but it is more consistent with <s> now that I am treating VCI as a Slavic interpretation rather than pretending it could be a purely language-neutral transcription system. 
If we read <béz bas> as "bez vas", this means "without you (plural)" in many Slavic languages.