Thank you @Anton, do you mean I should move my remark there?
My point was related to "daiin daiin daiin" specifically, because the words are yes repeated but each of them have a different lexical meaning.
They are not form of reduplication, they do not stress/intesify the point like Dante, not making a plural, not connected to each other.
I thin they are a different phenomenon, but I am no expert, but they do not fit with Emma's other valid sounding 5 points either, and they are not causes of dittography or haplography naturally.
Dain=Ajattelu (meaning 3, but maybe Voynichese needed quokedy to disambiguate in from meaning 1, or negate or anything else)
My point was related to "daiin daiin daiin" specifically, because the words are yes repeated but each of them have a different lexical meaning.
They are not form of reduplication, they do not stress/intesify the point like Dante, not making a plural, not connected to each other.
I thin they are a different phenomenon, but I am no expert, but they do not fit with Emma's other valid sounding 5 points either, and they are not causes of dittography or haplography naturally.
Better would be the Dianes example "dain, daiin, quokedy dain"
Dain=Ajattelun (meaining 1)
Daiin=Ajattelun (same word but meaning 2)
Dain=Ajattelu (meaning 3, but maybe Voynichese needed quokedy to disambiguate in from meaning 1, or negate or anything else)