[Article] The Linguistics of the Voynich Manuscript (Bowern et al. 2020)

[cbowern]

Gibberish / random / mumbojumbo seem to be words which can be used to prove or disprove any given Voynich-related assertion, depending on how you (re)define them.

If you can't be bothered to define what you actually mean by such imprecise / multivalent words, then you really shouldn't be using them in the first place. :-(

It's a perennial problem when using language to talk about language.