Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories

[Mark Knowles]

Mark, your approach is your option and I respect that. You are extremely focused to decipher the VMS. It is very similar with a commando having the mission to extract somebody located behind the enemy lines. Nothing else matter. 
Other people (including myself) have a more relaxed approach. The destination is important but we enjoy the journey as well. 
 My passion for VMS is a good opportunity for me to learn very interesting things related to  history, astronomy, biology, languages, linguistic, statistics etc. I like an approach with a wider perspective, without losing the focus on VMS. If one don't like this approach he must select what appreciate as relevant and ignore the rest. 
I would like to express my gratitude to all of the contributors for their effort to share ideas and for maintaining a decent discussion level.

How you or anyone approaches the Voynich is your or their choice, I was just presenting my perspective. There is a lot of focus on Wilfred Voynich, Newbold, Krauss etc. and for me there is almost no interest in these people or the modern history of the manuscript and its owners. But for some people these are very interesting topics.