Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories

[Mark Knowles]

On the basis of my theory it is clear that the key author is not well known

Mark, you may want to consider if this is really what you wanted to say.

What do you regard as problematic?

Clearly the "well known" is open to interpretation, so it is hard to know what your meaning is. There are some individuals connected to the person who in my theory is most obviously linked to the manuscript who are a bit better known, but it is debatable as to whether they could be said to be not well known.