(12-08-2020, 02:51 PM)farmerjohn wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
(12-08-2020, 01:36 PM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
It is immaterial whether one transliterates Sh as 'sh' or 'Sh'.
That's an interesting question, and the real issue here is surprisingly EVA-h.
Using EVA-s both as standalone and as part of sh ligature is not extremely convenient, but normal parser can live with that: s before h - ligature, otherwise - standalone.
...
Yes, agreed. A parser can live with it, but I've noticed that numerous researchers are using apps (e.g., math visualization) or code from other sources, both of which would require preprocessing in order for the data to work within these external environments, and how they handle the text is not always transparent (or configurable) once it is fed into the engine. So... the closer the transliteration represents the text without having to do this kind of parsing, the kinder it is to those who are not coding everything from scratch.