07-08-2020, 06:18 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-08-2020, 06:19 AM by Common_Man.)
Maybe you got the core idea for this thread from the word two factor authentication, but calling it that exact thing is misleading IMO. I guess what you are going for is - "The VMS combines features of a particular topic/well known picture from 2 different books that discuss the same topic." Kindof like the guy who wrote/drew the VMS wanted to combine 2 sources that talked about a certain thing, but deliberately made a mess out of it - thereby making notes and at the same time making the content near indecipherable to people who don't know about BOTH/ALL the sources.
If this is what you were going for, the idea looks good to me. Do post a few pictures/drawings showing the above mentioned points clearly. That way the discussion may move past the confusion the term is making.
Maybe I'm getting it all wrong, but it's intriguing if you extrapolate the idea to the text, especially when there are 2 dialects from the Currier times itself (even if its more of a smooth transition from one to the other).
But this too gives me a bad feeling - if he combined images from 2/multiple different sources, he must've had access to the text in these sources too. But from the analysis of the VMS text, it looks a bit like non-linguistic (?filler) content too.. So maybe he used text from these sources he took pictures from, and deliberately threw away a lot of information to use it as base for creating filler text & give an illusion of language/grammar at the same time.. #justVMSthings
If this is what you were going for, the idea looks good to me. Do post a few pictures/drawings showing the above mentioned points clearly. That way the discussion may move past the confusion the term is making.
Maybe I'm getting it all wrong, but it's intriguing if you extrapolate the idea to the text, especially when there are 2 dialects from the Currier times itself (even if its more of a smooth transition from one to the other).
But this too gives me a bad feeling - if he combined images from 2/multiple different sources, he must've had access to the text in these sources too. But from the analysis of the VMS text, it looks a bit like non-linguistic (?filler) content too.. So maybe he used text from these sources he took pictures from, and deliberately threw away a lot of information to use it as base for creating filler text & give an illusion of language/grammar at the same time.. #justVMSthings