Experiments with interpretation of the labels. The label otol.

[Anton]

Personally, I don’t see many ways to encrypt a separate word.

I can imagine quite a number. For the simplest example, one may substitute not single letters but, say, bigrams. Take the word "date", if "da" maps to "po" and "te" maps to "lo", then "date" maps to "polo", and there's no 1:1 mapping between single characters (instead, it exists for bigrams). The decipherer would in vain consider the two "o" characters to be the same.

For a more complex example, there is my idea expressed in another thread about prefixes as relational operators, like "otol" meaning something being made over "tol", for example otol = "with tol", while qotol = "without tol". (There are many labels starting with "o", but very few starting with "qo"). This idea still remains unexplored.