26-06-2020, 09:22 AM
This is not the kind of paper you can take serious. It is what I would call in German Reviermarkierung, there seems
to ne no English word. Only what is vetted by Higher Authorities can be printed. It is obvious that in the case of the VMs peer review does not work, the best example is her own paper about the Voynich hands. Apart from the criticism in Tims post, there is obvious faulty thinking, e.g. the statement, that it cant be RB, it cant be an autograph. Another point is the palaeography of the ms., there is not an illegible script but a Gothic minuscule and abbreviations. And she has not understood the codicological aspects of the ms.
to ne no English word. Only what is vetted by Higher Authorities can be printed. It is obvious that in the case of the VMs peer review does not work, the best example is her own paper about the Voynich hands. Apart from the criticism in Tims post, there is obvious faulty thinking, e.g. the statement, that it cant be RB, it cant be an autograph. Another point is the palaeography of the ms., there is not an illegible script but a Gothic minuscule and abbreviations. And she has not understood the codicological aspects of the ms.

