04-06-2020, 08:30 PM
Pisces sounds like the fun sign!
Seriously though, as many interpretations as people on this and most matters. If someone wrote it to represent a/the zodiac they could have done it any way they chose. The traditional interpretation relies on it being a genuine C15th manuscript and showing an accepted manner of illustration, same as most others of the time. What if it were a/the zodiac (astrological/calendar/astronomical etc) with data shown in an unconventional manner? Is that possible that it is not what it is accepted as? What if it looks like a dog, barks like a dog but is not a dog?
I suppose I never had issue with the concept of a broken down zodiac, but then I don't think its a run of the mill C15th manuscript.
Bunny
Seriously though, as many interpretations as people on this and most matters. If someone wrote it to represent a/the zodiac they could have done it any way they chose. The traditional interpretation relies on it being a genuine C15th manuscript and showing an accepted manner of illustration, same as most others of the time. What if it were a/the zodiac (astrological/calendar/astronomical etc) with data shown in an unconventional manner? Is that possible that it is not what it is accepted as? What if it looks like a dog, barks like a dog but is not a dog?
I suppose I never had issue with the concept of a broken down zodiac, but then I don't think its a run of the mill C15th manuscript.
Bunny