18-05-2020, 12:45 PM
Yes, the Prague manuscript or the Kircher manuscript makes more sense.
I have nothing against Polish names or English names, but neither seem relevant to the manuscript. I am not saying this as a result of any prejudice towards Polish people or as sign of a particular fondness for Italian people. My prefer for the origin of the manuscript has always been Georgia or Armenia (Caucasus), but unfortunately I very much doubt that is the case.
I have nothing against Polish names or English names, but neither seem relevant to the manuscript. I am not saying this as a result of any prejudice towards Polish people or as sign of a particular fondness for Italian people. My prefer for the origin of the manuscript has always been Georgia or Armenia (Caucasus), but unfortunately I very much doubt that is the case.

