[Article] Solved again and again ...

[-JKP-]

...

P.S. I have not read its translation carefully, but I do not see how it's worse than other "translations", it takes at all to make a world.

Many of the other translations are subjective, completely lacking in any kind of replicable methodolory, lacking in logic, and lacking in historical accuracy.

All those are also true of Cheshire's work and yet he belligerently defends it, plays sock puppet on blogs (and probably also on the forum), and outwardly attacks other Voynich researchers (and has from the beginning).


He wrote to many Voynich.ninja members before publishing his paper, and when they offered helpful advice, he apparently reacted with rudeness to several of them, and ignored the good information provided by the rest.


There's no advantage in trying to attract and pacify someone who continues to dish up unsubstantiated research and has a hot-headed attitude.