28-04-2020, 10:18 AM
Thanks for the link, Rene, I read, interesting. But what I find more interesting than the identification of plants is the deterioration of relations between this author and the rest of the Voynich community. Koen says that the author sent his article to him, which proves that he closely followed the activities of the community. On the other hand, today, you will not find in his article any mention of his predecessors, to believe that he's the first and the only researcher. It's embarrassing, coming from an academic. So I wonder if your criticism policy too severe has not produced results contrary to expectations? Perhaps a little more pedagogy is needed in order to attract the volunteers and supervise them instead of repelling them and letting them flourish in plagiarism.
P.S. I have not read its translation carefully, but I do not see how it's worse than other "translations", it takes at all to make a world.
P.S. I have not read its translation carefully, but I do not see how it's worse than other "translations", it takes at all to make a world.


