27-03-2020, 07:08 AM
I have a few questions on the mounting gaskets Q9, 11, 12, ROS, 17.
1 / Are there any traces of ink (paint) on the gaskets that did not get into the scans?
2 / Your opinion. Are these the original (initial) gaskets that were installed during the initial linking of the VMS?
3 / Are there additional holes on the bifolio bends (under the gaskets) that do not correspond to the holes in the gaskets?
4 / Your opinion, why the ROS gasket is installed under the sheet, because it is the heaviest sheet and the greatest wear should be on the layout under the twine.
Could there have been a chord-original ROS bunch at the adjacent (right) bend, where the page was repaired in 2014?
5 / What do you think of the additional mounting of ROS to f87r, according to the principle of double-sided tape? (Has anyone encountered such a method of additional fastening in other books?)
1 / Are there any traces of ink (paint) on the gaskets that did not get into the scans?
2 / Your opinion. Are these the original (initial) gaskets that were installed during the initial linking of the VMS?
3 / Are there additional holes on the bifolio bends (under the gaskets) that do not correspond to the holes in the gaskets?
4 / Your opinion, why the ROS gasket is installed under the sheet, because it is the heaviest sheet and the greatest wear should be on the layout under the twine.
Could there have been a chord-original ROS bunch at the adjacent (right) bend, where the page was repaired in 2014?
5 / What do you think of the additional mounting of ROS to f87r, according to the principle of double-sided tape? (Has anyone encountered such a method of additional fastening in other books?)