(26-03-2020, 04:12 PM)MarcoP Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.These are great news! Many thanks to Lisa, Koen and David!

In addition to what JKP wrote, I would be curious to know Lisa's views about the several, but short, Voynch marginalia.
Some of them (f17r, f66r, f116v) appear together with Voynichese words. Could they date to the same time-frame as the main text? Is there any hope of extracting some additional information from them? (e.g. about where/when they might have been written, or who might have used a similar script)
I would also love to know what she thinks of the other sets of marginalia, e.g. month names and quire numbers.
And what about the single characters / short words that could be colour annotations (e.g. f1v, 7fr)? What do they tell us?
...

• 1,000 samples of scripts with some similarity to 116v, of which 130 score reasonably high.
  
• 108 samples that bear some similarity to the alphabets in the right-hand column of f1r, of which about 10 have a reasonably high similarity.
  
• A few sample scripts that are similar to the de Tepenecz name on f1r.
  
• A handful of scripts that are similar to the color annotations (very difficult to research as they may not all be the same hand and there are very few).
  
• 488 samples that bear some similarity to the quire numbers, of which 228 are reasonably similar and 38 are quite similar.
  
• A handful of samples similar to the month-name labels added to the zodiac-figures section (difficult to research because the text is sparse).
  
• 455 samples that bear some similarity to the folio numbers, of which 189 are reasonably similar and 67 are quite similar.