26-03-2020, 09:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 26-03-2020, 09:53 PM by nickpelling.
Edit Reason: Typo fix
)
I'd like to ask Lisa:
1. Is she confident enough in her palaeographic readings of the different Voynich hands that she can suggest (to some degree) what the original bifolio nesting and gatherings were?
2. What is her physical interpretation of the state of the marks on f116v? That is, does she think michitonese is as intended or as emended?
1. Is she confident enough in her palaeographic readings of the different Voynich hands that she can suggest (to some degree) what the original bifolio nesting and gatherings were?
2. What is her physical interpretation of the state of the marks on f116v? That is, does she think michitonese is as intended or as emended?
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)