|
[Article] On the Voynich manuscript
|
 Member details
Posts: 4,493 Threads: 170 Thanks Received: 3,319 in 1,868 posts Thanks Given: 579 Joined: Jan 2016 Reputation: 10 Country: 
07-02-2020, 01:56 PM
For me, this paper does not reflect positively on Cryptologia.
What could be the advantage of publishing a paper suggesting that the MS was (co-authored) by John Dee, with disastrous 'graphological' evidence to support it? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
On the Voynich manuscript - by Torsten - 04-02-2020, 06:09 PM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by nickpelling - 04-02-2020, 09:48 PM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by Torsten - 05-02-2020, 08:06 AM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by Linda - 05-02-2020, 06:29 AM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by ReneZ - 05-02-2020, 08:26 AM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by bi3mw - 05-02-2020, 05:20 PM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by Linda - 05-02-2020, 09:32 PM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by Koen G - 05-02-2020, 10:28 PM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by ReneZ - 06-02-2020, 07:49 AM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by -JKP- - 06-02-2020, 08:46 AM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by ReneZ - 06-02-2020, 08:55 AM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by -JKP- - 06-02-2020, 01:03 PM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by bi3mw - 06-02-2020, 06:36 PM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by ReneZ - 07-02-2020, 01:56 PM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by Alin_J - 27-07-2020, 09:28 AM
RE: On the Voynich manuscript - by -JKP- - 27-07-2020, 10:17 AM
|
