06-11-2019, 09:38 PM
I suppose an obvious example of reading too much into details is what I believe Newbold did by interpreting cracks in the ink of Voynich writing as micro-characters.
However on the 9 Rosette foldout there are a lot of specific details which could only be a result of conscious decisions which in most cases I would think have a basis in things the author had visually observed whether in real life or in manuscripts, of course imagination is very important, but even imagination is normally at its core based to a significant extent on observation . This is why I find it frustrating that so very many specific details on this page seem largely ignored.
However on the 9 Rosette foldout there are a lot of specific details which could only be a result of conscious decisions which in most cases I would think have a basis in things the author had visually observed whether in real life or in manuscripts, of course imagination is very important, but even imagination is normally at its core based to a significant extent on observation . This is why I find it frustrating that so very many specific details on this page seem largely ignored.