The leaves if 52r are completely wrong for ginger. And the flower is different, as well. Even the rhizome is wrong for ginger:
Here are some medieval and early modern ginger drawings. Note the thin plain leaves and the color and soft edges of the rhizomes:
- Ginger leaves are moderately slender and plain. They are never vaguely handlike with fingers.
- Ginger root is yellowish (not a deep red) and most people drew it yellowish brown or brownish. Red pigment was more expensive than the others. Why use a lot of heavily-laid-on red (the VMS root is red mixed with brown, but it still has a lot of red in it) for a yellowish root? The VMS red is obviously deliberate since the ends are conspicuously light.
- Ginger was readily dried, so it came in from the east earlier than many other trade-route plants because it was easier to transport without spoiling. In the Middle Ages they called it Zinziber or Synsiber.
- Ginger flowers are on a separate stalk. They look a bit like a garden torch coming out of the ground. The flower is usually shades of red or pink. The VMS flower is at the top of a leaf stalk rather than on a separate stalk, and it is light blue.
- The VMS illustrator drew accurate Nymphoides, accurate Ricinus, Tragopogon, Viola, and Phu. Why would he or she draw ginger so completely wrong, a plant that was familiar, a plant that most illustrators got right?
Here are some medieval and early modern ginger drawings. Note the thin plain leaves and the color and soft edges of the rhizomes:


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)