[Article] Solved again and again ...

[-JKP-]

Consonants and Vowels paper

GC is going to keep making up stuff until he accidentally posts something that is vaguely true (a broken watch is right twice a day) and then will leverage that into some great claim.

It's a sad replacement for real research.

I notice he is still referring to "the use of Italics" (page 2) which is a complete misunderstanding of the meaning of "Italics".

And Naples had not "evolved into early Italian" by this time, that happened centuries earlier. Naples was using medieval Italian, not "early Italian".

And saying the "monasteries would retain obsolete languages and writing systems deliberately" is completely wrong. The level of education at monasteries was so high compared to the general populace, they were the ones who established the forerunners to public school systems, and they were the ones who established many of the important scriptoria. They did not "retain" the obsolete languages, they were often at the forefront of language evolution.

There's still no grammar in his translations, and he still picks and chooses meanings from numerous languages.

We are supposed to believe transliterations like "o n as uas n"? He calls this "common abbreviated Latin phrasing". That's nonsense. I doubt if he can read medieval Latin and I strongly doubt if he has a working knowledge of Latin abbreviations. If he did, he wouldn't make this claim.

He claims that olé nasas means dangerous traps.

I couldn't even read the rest. I scanned through it. It's just more of the same from the previous papers.