Oh wow! Just read Keidan's response to G. Cheshire's paper...
When I blogged about Cheshire's paper, I tried to keep my focus on analyzing the statements themselves rather than the person (and will continue to do so), but Keidan doesn't mince words, he comes right out and says,
"Dr Cheshire appears unfit to decipher anything, and to do philological research in general. His views on languages and linguistics are those of a teenager who just found out that the secret alphabets are so fun."
But he does also give some very targeted critical statements.
When I blogged about Cheshire's paper, I tried to keep my focus on analyzing the statements themselves rather than the person (and will continue to do so), but Keidan doesn't mince words, he comes right out and says,
"Dr Cheshire appears unfit to decipher anything, and to do philological research in general. His views on languages and linguistics are those of a teenager who just found out that the secret alphabets are so fun."
But he does also give some very targeted critical statements.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)