I wanted to write this up properly (I have additional information), but I simply cannot find the time.
So, here is the text in the sample, plus some of the text that follows it so you get to see a bigger chunk.
Those who are familiar with Voynichese will probably notice immediately (especially in the first two lines), that there is a high preponderance of "a".
Also, at the ends of words, a frequent ending of -dam (which is sometimes pointed). I reasoned that one way to deal with the point on the m at the end was to add a minim, since that wouldn't give away that it was the same letter with a point and might be a natural way to write it.
Note also the repetition of certain syllabic groups (as is common to Asian languages).
It even has "shifts", which is quite interesting, because the VMS tends to have groups that repeat certain patterns more often than others.
It really does have many of the properties of VMS text.
These are classical Buddhist writings in Romanized Sanskrit:
anirodham anutpādam anucchedam aśāśvataṃ
anekārtham anānārtham anāgamam anirgamaṃ
yaḥ pratītyasamutpādaṃ prapañcopaśamaṃ śivaṃ
deśayāmāsa saṃbuddhas taṃ vande vadatāṃ varaṃ
na svato nāpi parato na dvābhyāṃ nāpy ahetutaḥ
utpannā jātu vidyante bhāvāḥ kvacana kecana
catvāraḥ pratyayā hetur ārambaṇam anantaraṃ
tathaivādhipateyaṃ ca pratyayo nāsti pañcamaḥ...
As mentioned previously, I did use one null, and I did change spaces somewhat to give it more Voynich-like properties, but I don't think it was too out of line as I honestly believe the spaces may have been manipulated (or planned in some way) in the VMS (still not completely sure, but I think it's possible).
So, here is the text in the sample, plus some of the text that follows it so you get to see a bigger chunk.
Those who are familiar with Voynichese will probably notice immediately (especially in the first two lines), that there is a high preponderance of "a".
Also, at the ends of words, a frequent ending of -dam (which is sometimes pointed). I reasoned that one way to deal with the point on the m at the end was to add a minim, since that wouldn't give away that it was the same letter with a point and might be a natural way to write it.
Note also the repetition of certain syllabic groups (as is common to Asian languages).
It even has "shifts", which is quite interesting, because the VMS tends to have groups that repeat certain patterns more often than others.
It really does have many of the properties of VMS text.
These are classical Buddhist writings in Romanized Sanskrit:
anirodham anutpādam anucchedam aśāśvataṃ
anekārtham anānārtham anāgamam anirgamaṃ
yaḥ pratītyasamutpādaṃ prapañcopaśamaṃ śivaṃ
deśayāmāsa saṃbuddhas taṃ vande vadatāṃ varaṃ
na svato nāpi parato na dvābhyāṃ nāpy ahetutaḥ
utpannā jātu vidyante bhāvāḥ kvacana kecana
catvāraḥ pratyayā hetur ārambaṇam anantaraṃ
tathaivādhipateyaṃ ca pratyayo nāsti pañcamaḥ...
As mentioned previously, I did use one null, and I did change spaces somewhat to give it more Voynich-like properties, but I don't think it was too out of line as I honestly believe the spaces may have been manipulated (or planned in some way) in the VMS (still not completely sure, but I think it's possible).


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)