18-03-2019, 12:21 AM
My translation is not quite character-based, it's Voynichese pattern-based. It's not token-based like Don's method.
Since René chose Italian, I chose something else (mainly to make it interesting). If I have time when I get back, I'll try it with a couple of other languages to see what happens.
I did not make a distinction for m as a separate character. I treated it the way I suspect m is used in the VMS and the way certain symbols are used in scribal Latin. It's possible it is a separate character and yet still works the same way. I need to look at this more specifically to see if I can figure which way it leans in Voynichese. I've studied most of the glyph patterns pretty intensely, but I put m on the back-burner until I got some of the other issues sorted out.
Since René chose Italian, I chose something else (mainly to make it interesting). If I have time when I get back, I'll try it with a couple of other languages to see what happens.
I did not make a distinction for m as a separate character. I treated it the way I suspect m is used in the VMS and the way certain symbols are used in scribal Latin. It's possible it is a separate character and yet still works the same way. I need to look at this more specifically to see if I can figure which way it leans in Voynichese. I've studied most of the glyph patterns pretty intensely, but I put m on the back-burner until I got some of the other issues sorted out.